FAQyMe Logo

The FAQyMe Gene Archive: A Depository of Historic Child Sexual Abuse Data


In the Public Interest by Child Abuse Survivors and their Advocates in their Pursuit of Justice, Recognition, Recovery and Redress.

<< First   < Previous   Current Page "1186"   Next >   Last >>

Article Category: 2007 October

California bishop faces contempt charge

Description: California bishop faces contempt charge

Article originally prepared on : 12 October 2007

http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=54066
 
California bishop faces contempt charge

Los Angeles, Oct. 10, 2007 (CWNews.com) - Bishop Tod Brown of Orange,California, has entered a not-guilty plea on contempt-of-court chargesstemming from a lawsuit involving sexual abuse by diocesan clergy.

Plaintiffs'lawyers in the sex-abuse suit had asked the judge to hold Bishop Brownin contempt because the bishop approved a move to send a key diocesanofficial out of the country before that official completed histestimony in the connection with the case.

Althoughthe lawsuit was settled last week, Judge Gail Andler surprised manylegal observers by moving forward with the contempt proceedings.

Ifconvicted of contempt, Bishop Brown could face a prison sentence.Hearings in the case are expected to take place in December.

PeterCallahan, the attorney for Bishop Brown, told reporters that the bishopwanted to fight the contempt charges, even after the case was closed,in order to "clear the bishop's name." The attorney said that Brown hadhoped that he would "have the opportunity to exonerate himself bytelling the truth but he didn't get the opportunity" in the course ofthe lawsuit brought by the abuse victims.

Earlierin the month, Callahan had said that the contempt charges were merely astalling tactic, employed by lawyers for the plaintiffs in the abuselawsuit to postpone the court proceedings. He said Bishop Brown waseager to go to trial in the case. Just hours later the dioceseannounced an out-of-court settlement in which the diocese will paynearly $7 million in damages to the plaintiffs.

 

If you wish to keep this article alive in the Internet Archive simply click the link below.
Click here to add this page to the Internet Archive

Divider - dont forget to donate so we can keep on with education to protect children - hope you benefitted from reading this

<< First   < Previous   Current Page "1186"   Next >   Last >>

Select from these TFYQA archives
Contact us if you have data you want to preserve.

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

Tell others, share this page on : X |  BlueSky |  Mastodon.Social |  Strangeminds.Social |  Facebook

Find us on X.com || New ID on Facebook || BlueSky || Mastodon.Social || Strangeminds.Social


Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

  trauma informed    human rights    justice    failed institutions    UN Convention on Human Rights    Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia    future    evidence    resilience    not providing or representing a secular Australia    autodidact  

Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.

.

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these resources to more survivors. These pages are focused on preserving survivor relevant information. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.

You can directly support my work at here

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

Were you like so many others born into a constitutionally protected God based death and rape culture?

Copyright The FAQyMe Gene © 2022.
TFYQA happily uses IP2Location.io IP geolocation web service. XML Site Map