Is the Royal Commission being ridiculous?

Is the Royal Commission being ridiculous?

Let's for the moment test this hypothesis.

The existence of Felicity Anne Ingrid Laura Edwenar Dorris Jones III is an unanswerable question. She does not exist until we can find some evidence for her existence.

It then becomes a fallacy to say that The mind of Felicity Anne Ingrid Laura Edwenar Dorris Jones III

It then becomes a fallacy to say that the mind of Felicity Anne Ingrid Laura Edwenar Dorris Jones III is unknowable as we have yet to provide evidence for his existence - the assumption must be made that Felicity Anne Ingrid Laura Edwenar Dorris Jones III 's mind must exist if we accept the false premises as if we answered this correctly we would say there is no mind to consider as there has been no evidence provided to incline any acceptance of the notion perhaps only to add that no mind exists as there is no Felicity Anne Ingrid Laura Edwenar Dorris Jones III.  Adding further fallacies to this by quoting supposed words said to have come from Felicity are also fallacies as at this point there has been no evidence provided that shows that she actually exists. Her existence can only be an assumption until evidence is provided to show us otherwise.

The onus of evidence is on the individual who makes the claim for Felicity Anne Ingrid Laura Edwenar Dorris Jones III's existence. It would be pointless to say that Felicity said "You must believe me or I will punish you simply because I love you" as to accept that we know that that would be described as a delusion or fantasy.

Anything ascribed to the mind of Felicity is simply someone's fantasy; it becomes a delusion when someone insists that the words of Felicity must be followed to the letter else some calamity will befall us.

The existence of god is an unanswerable question. He does not exist until we can find some evidence for his existence.

It then becomes a fallacy to say that the mind of god is unknowable as we have yet to provide evidence for his existence - the assumption must be made that god's mind must exist if we accept the false premises as if we answered this correctly we would say there is no mind to consider as there has been no evidence provided to incline any acceptance of the notion perhaps only to add that no mind exists as there is no god. Adding further fallacies to this by quoting supposed words said to have come from god are also fallacies as at this point there has been no evidence provided that shows that he actually exists. His existence can only be an assumption until evidence is provided to show us otherwise.

The onus of evidence is on the individual who makes the claim for god's existence. It would be pointless to say that god said "You must believe me or I will punish you simply because I love you" as to accept that we know that that would be described as a delusion or fantasy.

Anything ascribed to the mind of god is simply someone's fantasy; it becomes a delusion when someone insists that the words of god must be followed to the letter else some calamity will befall us.

That is why when someone continually cites scripture, respect for god, obedience to god's laws that they get asked for evidence for the existence of this god as we all know that if the premises is false then all that follows ifs false - this is another reason why evidence is asked for.

Sure I can ask you to have faith or simply to believe me the both god and felicity are real and you are free to engage in my fantasy for as long as you want however this would not be evidence for the existence of Felicity or god as we all know that this would only be evidence that both of us are engaging in a fantasy simply done to appease my whim fantasy, fears or mis-held belief or indoctrination into a deception.

All of that becomes irrelevant if Felicity were to stand up and say "Here I am. Here is my credit card, my drivers license, my brother, my sister, my mother, my father, uncles and aunts and my grandparents as well as my neighbors, we have been here for hundreds of years and here is a copy of my family tree. As well here is my birth certificate complete with photographs of the witnesses to my birth and of some of the people whose signature is on my birth certificate as evidence of my name, my existence, the date etc of my birth. Is there any more evidence that I can provide for you?

As difficult as it might be we would be faced with the need to reassess our original skepticism and to accept that Felicity is a real person with a mind that we can know and that she has evidence for her existence and for her name. Without any of that our skepticism must and will return and we dismiss the notion of her existence as a delusion.

It is for that reason and for many other reasons why people who insist on enforcing demands and on teaching children that these fantasies are truths - there can be nothing more absurd.  Those of us who agree that the mind of god can never be known as there is no evidence for his existence and that therefore all that follows from this is the concoctions of many developed and evolved over centuries. On each and every occasion that something is required by a religion it remains a fallacy no matter how many people have been deceived into believing it.

 repeatedly asked for evidence for the existence of this god he claims exists.

Until clear and unequivocal evidence can be provided; evidence as concrete as that provided by Felicity then I hold that the claim is false and remains so until that evidence is produced. The claim for the existence of god remains unanswered and unproven. It is a claim and remains just that - a claim. A claim with no evidence.

It is at this point that the credibility of the Royal Commission comes into question.

The Royal Commission is based on Christian origins, they have been for centuries. Every piece of legislation that has been enacted in this country has been dissected on the basis of the word of a god that for all intents and purposes does not exist yet the fears of not following the fantasy is deemed to be real - our laws are based on the notion of god king and country. Our parliament prays to a non existent entity and the supposed words of this god are interpreted to meet the needs of those who seek power and control over others; their words are worthless and nothing but fantasy until they can provide evidence to the standard required for all others living on the face of this planet.

How much faith and how must trust can we put into a Royal Commission that is itself based on the whims and fantasies of kings and politicians for centuries? What sort of country would this delusion result in and what sort of environment are we providing for our children? Is it any wonder they are confused and angry as the reality of this is in front of them on a daily basis. It is a wonder that more of them do not suicide or turn to drugs as an alternative to an all pervasive collective insanity.

The Royal Commission if it holds true to the requirements of its regulation must find for the few bad apples theory and politicians must limit the costs to the perpetrators who have lost all sense of direction taking our whole society into a delusion of men who have rejected a normal life amongst us in the community. Men who for centuries have gouged and conspired to favor their enterprises no matter how absurd all based on a fantasy until the evidence for the premises of their claims is provided.

Until that evidence is provided I consider the Royal Commission to be tainted by this very delusion. My evidence for that is the existence of the bible and its use as a determinant to obtain the truth of the deceptions that have caused the rape and the abuse of tens of thousands of women and children.

What trust can you place in a Royal Commission who takes evidence and generously broadcasts it to the world in a manner that is guaranteed to keep the reminders away from the general public through not publishing and making available the videos of each days evidence.

How much assurance can you find in a Royal Commission that spends months and months delving in trauma after trauma and never once raising the question as to the evidence of the one thing that the entire group of individuals and organizations say they base their life upon. Without evidence for the existence of the god that they rely upon their evidence must be seen to be tainted by delusion, deception or fraud by those who know that facts and the reality of this.

How much faith and respect can we have for a Royal Commission who seeks evidence for each and every step of every stakeholder involved in this toxic mess when it too accepts the delusion of the existence of god clearly knowing that there is no evidence for this claim and therefore it is engaging in a fraud or gargantuan and horrible dimensions aimed at defrauding those who seek the truth and the and answer to the "Why?" question put by Justice Peter McClellan.

All the religions involved in these abused must be expected to provide evidence for the existence of their god else all that they present must be dismissed as their is no evidence to support the original claim upon which the rest is based upon.

All of this insanity goes on one a daily basis and nothing is heard about the tens of thousands of children forced into acceptance of this delusion under an endless litany of threats of torture of pain and punishment, of banishment and abandonment all to meet the delusions of those who accept these fantastic claims with out evidence.

Meanwhile based on the same insanity the Royal Commission is eagerly calling for more victims to come forward to be re-immersed into the insanity of their abuse only to be deceived as a result of the lack of evidence for the entire structure and understanding of the reality that faces us all.

Tens of thousands of us who have survived this insanity know this and we came forward in the hope that an end would come to the endless abuse of of children that has resulted from a world that has been led and controlled by insanity and delusion.

Can we trust a Royal Commission who chooses to ignore those of us who have striven hard to raise our children free of the toxic effects of this delusion?

When faced with the reality of the systemic and endemic abuse found in each and everyone of the religions that abusers belonged to not being brought into question by the Royal Commission the only conclusion that the people of the country can come to is that the Royal Commission is placing the rights and the fantasies of those of religion before the rights and the need for protection of children. In that scenario the Royal Commission can only find for the fantastical and delusional conclusion that the problem is the result of a few bad apples that have infested the perfect word of a god that hos no proof of existence.

Until the Royal Commission can show that it unambiguously places the rights and the natural needs of mothers and children before the delusions of an unproven religion and that it shows its intention to see that each and every victim and survivor of this receives the maximum possible compensation then we are left to piss into the wind or to spit into one hand and to wish into the other to see which one gets filled first as the potential for a real outcome will be just as delusional.

Children deserve better. The country deserves better. We all deserve better and the Royal Commission is letting us down and will continue to do so until it settles the question so that we can all move forward to the better future that we are entitled to.

Is the Royal Commission acting in a most ridiculous manner when it accepts without evidence the entire basis upon which those of religion exist in the light of the endless abuses that have been and are yet to be disclosed.

Yes.

JohnB
0756412311