In the Public Interest by Child Abuse Survivors and their Advocates in their Pursuit of Justice, Recognition, Recovery and Redress.
<< First < Previous Current Page "790" Next > Last >>
Article Category: 2007 January
Description:
Article originally prepared on : 19 January 2007
The diocese sued the insurance companies to get them to cover theclaims of 57 people who allege they were sexually abused by priests.
The insurers argued in court that more than 7,500 pages of documentsfrom the church will enable them to see how diocese handled allegationsof sexual abuse by priests and whether it fulfilled its obligation toprotect the public.
In his ruling, Berkshire Superior Court Associate Justice John A.Agostini rejected the diocese' arguments that documents were protectedfrom disclosure under the First Amendment, priest-penitent privilege,religious autonomy and psychotherapist-patient privileges, TheRepublican newspaper of Springfield reported Thursday.
The judge, however, agreed with the diocese that some documents wereprotected by attorney-client privilege. Agostini heard arguments inDecember.
"Speaking for myself, I think you could say we were very pleased,''Adam Simms, a Boston attorney for one of the companies, North StarReinsurance Corp. of Stamford, Conn., told the newspaper.
The diocese is reviewing the decision and may appeal against the ruling, spokesman Mark E. Dupont, told The Republican.
Greenfield lawyer John J. Stobierski, however, was happy with theruling, describing it as "a significant repudiation'' of the positionstaken by the diocese in its efforts to keep the documents secret.
"There were a lot of creative legal arguments that were made and notaccepted by the court,'' said Stobierski, who represents more than 20people with abuse claims.
The Springfield diocese settled claims from 46 other claimants for more than $7 million in 2004.
If you wish to keep this article alive in the Internet Archive simply click the link below.
Click here to add this page to the Internet Archive
<< First < Previous Current Page "790" Next > Last >>
Select from these TFYQA archives
Contact us if you have data you want to preserve.
Tell others, share this page on : X | BlueSky | Mastodon.Social | Strangeminds.Social | Facebook
Find us on X.com || New ID on Facebook || BlueSky || Mastodon.Social || Strangeminds.Social
trauma informed human rights justice failed institutions UN Convention on Human Rights Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia future evidence resilience not providing or representing a secular Australia autodidact
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.
.
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these resources to more survivors. These pages are focused on preserving survivor relevant information. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
You can directly support my work at here