FAQyMe Logo

The FAQyMe Gene Archive: A Depository of Historic Child Sexual Abuse Data


In the Public Interest by Child Abuse Survivors and their Advocates in their Pursuit of Justice, Recognition, Recovery and Redress.

<< First   < Previous   Current Page "155"   Next >   Last >>

Article Category: 2006 August

Ruling due in `pedophile' defamation case:[O SA Country Edition]

Description:

Article originally prepared on : 16 August 2006

Jeremy Roberts.  The Australian.  Canberra, A.C.T.:Aug15, 2006.  p. 4
 
A JUDGE will decide today whether to throw out the state's firstcriminal
defamation trial in 46 years after the defendants argued they had no caseto
answer because the "victims" had never publicly denied they werepedophiles.
 
If South Australian District Court judge Marie Shaw decides the ninecharges
against Wendy Utting, Barry Standfield and a third defendant, CraigRatcliff,
stand, she must then decide whether the case will be divided into two, withMr
Ratcliff facing a separate trial. Mr Ratcliff in March last year allegedto
journalists that a Labor MP was a pedophile and had been video-taped atan
inner- Adelaide gay beat engaged in illegal sexual conduct with a teenageboy.
 
The controversy took a surreal turn when then parliamentary speakerPeter
Lewis, a self-styled anti-corruption campaigner and his two volunteerstaff, Ms
Utting and Mr Standfield, repeated the claims and, along with MrRatcliff,
suggested two gay men who also knew about the Labor MP had beenmurdered.
 
At the height of the controversy a fax was sent to numerous mediaorganisations
naming the Labor MP and three others -- two serving police officers anda
former state Liberal politician -- as pedophiles.
 
In five days of pre-trial argument, Ms Utting's lawyer, George Manciniargued
his client had "no case to answer" because none of the victims had everdenied
the claims to the court.
 
"There is no evidence by way of declaration of witness statementsabout
falsity," Mr Mancini said. He argued that it was not enough for theclaims
against the men to be "inherently untrue or despicable". He said the Crownmust
present evidence, like a denial, that the original claims were false.
 
Judge Shaw said that even judicial officers were "not immune from whatsome
people call despicable acts".
 
A police investigation into the claims turned into evidence- gathering forwhat
became nine charges of criminal defamation against the threedefendants.
 
The Rann Government kept silent but warned media organisations theyrisked
criminal defamation charges if anyone was named. The four men were notnamed in
the media.
 

If you wish to keep this article alive in the Internet Archive simply click the link below.
Click here to add this page to the Internet Archive

Divider - dont forget to donate so we can keep on with education to protect children - hope you benefitted from reading this

<< First   < Previous   Current Page "155"   Next >   Last >>

Select from these TFYQA archives
Contact us if you have data you want to preserve.

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

Tell others, share this page on : X |  BlueSky |  Mastodon.Social |  Strangeminds.Social |  Facebook

Find us on X.com || New ID on Facebook || BlueSky || Mastodon.Social || Strangeminds.Social


Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

  trauma informed    human rights    justice    failed institutions    UN Convention on Human Rights    Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia    future    evidence    resilience    not providing or representing a secular Australia    autodidact  

Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.

.

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these resources to more survivors. These pages are focused on preserving survivor relevant information. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.

You can directly support my work at here

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

Were you like so many others born into a constitutionally protected God based death and rape culture?

Copyright The FAQyMe Gene © 2022.
TFYQA happily uses IP2Location.io IP geolocation web service. XML Site Map