FAQyMe Logo

The FAQyMe Gene Archive: A Depository of Historic Child Sexual Abuse Data


In the Public Interest by Child Abuse Survivors and their Advocates in their Pursuit of Justice, Recognition, Recovery and Redress.

<< First   < Previous   Current Page "1094"   Next >   Last >>

Article Category: 2007 September

Judge pulls 42 abuse cases out of diocese's bankruptcy, into jury trials

Description: Judge pulls 42 abuse cases out of diocese's bankruptcy, into jury trials

Article originally prepared on : 02 September 2007

http://www.catholic.org/national/national_story.php?id=25206
 
Judge pulls 42 abuse cases out of diocese's bankruptcy, into jury trials
 
SAN DIEGO, Calif. (CNS) – A federal judge Aug. 25 ordered 42 of the 127lawsuits over sexual abuse claims to be removed from the Diocese of SanDiego's bankruptcy case so they can go to jury trials in state court.

Bankruptcy Court Judge Louise DeCarlAdler found that leaving the 42 plaintiffs in the group that thediocese has sought to settle with in bankruptcy proceedings wouldamount to depriving them of their Seventh Amendment right to a jurytrial and "will cause severe prejudice to the plaintiffs, especiallysince these cases are intensely fact-driven."

Adler's 14-page ruling said that although thediocese filed for bankruptcy because of the lawsuits "prompt resolutionof these claims through the bankruptcy process is unlikely."

She said twice in the ruling that the $95 millionoffered to the plaintiffs in a financial reorganization plan is "farbelow the historical statewide average."

The Archdiocese of Los Angeles in July announced asettlement agreement that called for the church to pay more than 500victims of sexual abuse by priests a total of $660 million.

Adler noted that the time period for claimsagainst the San Diego Diocese will not pass until Feb. 27, 2008, theearliest date when a district court could feasibly begin to estimatethe claims. Because the diocese hasn't explained how such estimateswould be accomplished "except to indicate there will be no jurytrials," she said, "it is likely there will be significant disputesconcerning how it should be accomplished."

Further appeals are also likely, "since thedebtor's desired process will deprive plaintiffs of their SeventhAmendment right to a jury trial," she said.

Adler also said that unless the diocesesubstantially increases the amount it proposes as a settlement fund,she foresees "a lengthy confirmation process." Since the plaintiffsrequested jury trials, she said, the factors overwhelmingly favorremanding 42 cases to the state court for liquidation through trial orsettlement, rather than through estimation or liquidation through trialin a federal court.

She dismissed the diocese's argument that sendingindividual cases into the state court system will be a burden on thecourts. "The state court was already handling all of the actions andhad already absorbed the workload," she wrote. "Further, the court isonly remanding 42 of the 127 actions at this time. Based upon thehistory of the clergy cases statewide, the court believes that trying(or the possibility of trying) the first five actions may spursettlements or, at the very least, assist in placing a value on theremaining cases not remanded."

Adler also accused the diocese of "forumshopping," hoping to pay each plaintiff a lower amount by proceedingwith the cases in the federal bankruptcy court than it would have topay if the cases were litigated in a state court.

When the diocese filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcyFeb. 27, it stopped trials scheduled to begin in several of the 127cases in the following days and weeks. The 42 cases set aside from thebankruptcy case represent 58 plaintiffs, the ruling said.

 

If you wish to keep this article alive in the Internet Archive simply click the link below.
Click here to add this page to the Internet Archive

Divider - dont forget to donate so we can keep on with education to protect children - hope you benefitted from reading this

<< First   < Previous   Current Page "1094"   Next >   Last >>

Select from these TFYQA archives
Contact us if you have data you want to preserve.

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

Tell others, share this page on : X |  BlueSky |  Mastodon.Social |  Strangeminds.Social |  Facebook

Find us on X.com || New ID on Facebook || BlueSky || Mastodon.Social || Strangeminds.Social


Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

  trauma informed    human rights    justice    failed institutions    UN Convention on Human Rights    Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia    future    evidence    resilience    not providing or representing a secular Australia    autodidact  

Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.

.

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these resources to more survivors. These pages are focused on preserving survivor relevant information. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.

You can directly support my work at here

Contact us if you have data you want to preserve

Were you like so many others born into a constitutionally protected God based death and rape culture?

Copyright The FAQyMe Gene © 2022.
TFYQA happily uses IP2Location.io IP geolocation web service. XML Site Map