Revealing hidden truths: data from child abuse survivors to secure justice and recognition.
<< First < Previous Current Page "1068" Next > Last >>
Article originally prepared on : 03 May 2014
Article Category: Guest
Description:
Members of the ADF who were under 21 and abused in the services before 1972 take note.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ALREADY MASS DISTRIBUTED ON TWITTER: NOW TO GO ON VERY EXTENSIVE MASS-DISTRIBUTION LIST PLEASE DISTR TO YOUR OWN LISTS ASAP
Per your warnings to some of your Duntroon associates today, beware the ides of march, (ANZAC related skeletons) you thought were safely buried, the fellow from the royal commission rang today, advising any at law child soldiers to make verbal and or written complaints re their military child abuse, hence below.
They are most fascinated with all the general officers, including a couple of particularized conservative appointed and protected commanders in chiefs, who are direct and or indirect perpetrators and or criminal accessories, because they looked the other way, they also agree that any person who witnessed and or became aware of any direct or indirect sexual abuse, touching to full penetration and or verbal suggestions and or arguable grooming, disguised as induction aka bastardization. Per our earlier discussions at the launch of this royal commission, arguably EVERY entrant to Duntroon, in principle, becomes either a victim and or witness and or an active and or inactive perpetrator, same applies to the navy Junior recruits and ALL the service apprentice establishments and all military establishments where at law non adults were sexually abused.
On this basis, is it a reasonable question, is any officer graduate and or failed graduate, a candidate for the royal commission barbecue? Consequently ANY one of these categories called, when asked,"were you a victim, accessory and or at law perpetrator" a denial = criminal perjury, when the usual royal commission trap is sprung, weren't you present and or aware of this criminal abuse? By their terms of reference does the Houston admission implicate every living CDF and service chief and every living defence minister who attempts to play dumb and or overtly protect their general officers? Those victims who do not want to come forward, arguably can be called in camera, to confirm abuses and the witness identified perpetrators. Presumably this will include the two media known now barristers.
All police force members when a royal commission is imposed on them, live in fear of the "mate" who has rolled over and set them up for the terrifying type question. "are you still beating your wife"? Aka assume that any royal commission question, the answer is already known, lie and you will go to jail. The perpetrator and or witness dilemma, do I roll over in camera or risk being called in public and treated as a hostile witness
In the alleged words of ex minister Hill to current minister Johnstone, "the bloody high command are and always have been a law unto themselves", may be about to be deservedly and belatedly overturned? Will the Bilderberg "interests" intervene to protect some of their unofficial ADF related disciples or discard them as expendable scapegoats?
I wonder if anyone actually realizes where this runaway royal commission will "inquire"?
All members of the ADF under the age of 21 up until the age majority change in 1972, were at LAW CHILDREN, within the terms of reference of the Royal Commission, per their advice today, 2 May 2014..
Public Invitation
The Honourable Justice Peter McClellan AM of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse is seeking submissions into sexual abuse of ADF child service persons as abuse victims and or witnesses and or accessories and or perpetrators and or awareness of events and their cover-up. Those victims who were bullied and or intimidated into out of court settlements with ADF non-disclosure caveats, may discover that the non-disclosure caveats are not relevant to the protection afforded by the royal commission.
At law all DART submissions are discoverable documents to the royal commission and perpetrators and accessories can be called for cross examination that DART will not do.
Telephone Jerome on 02 8284 2491
02 8284 2491 or The Honourable Justice Peter McClellan AM contact@childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au and or Janette Dines Chief Executive Officer registerinterest@childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au
Initial contacts will be responded to by telephone and can make submission in camera and or public, that is the victims decision.
Any information victims may feel comfortable with sharing with Senator elect Jacqui Lambie and Senator Nick Xenophon may assist the thousands of intimidated silent child and adult victims.
All members of the ADF under the age of 21 up until the age majority change in 1972, were at LAW CHILDREN, within the terms of reference of the Royal Commission, per their advice today, 2 May 2014..
List Molested Catholics Categories

If you wish to keep this article alive in the Internet Archive simply click the link below.
Click here to add this page to the Internet Archive
Select from these TFYQA archives
Contact us if you have data you want to preserve.
Tell others, share this page on : X | BlueSky | Mastodon.Social | Strangeminds.Social | Facebook
Find us on X.com || New ID on Facebook || BlueSky || Mastodon.Social || Strangeminds.Social
trauma informed human rights justice failed institutions UN Convention on Human Rights Rights of the Child and a Bill of Rights for Australia future evidence resilience not providing or representing a secular Australia autodidact
Hegemony: The authority, dominance, and influence of one group, nation, or society over another group, nation, or society; typically through cultural, economic, or political means.
.
If you found this information to be of assistance please don't forget to donate so that we can extend these resources to more survivors. These pages are focused on preserving survivor relevant information. Information is not provided as legal or professional advice; it is provided as general information only and requires that you validate any information via your own legal or other professional service providers.
You can directly support my work at here