Dan Box expressing his obsessions yet again

Will Dan Box of the Australian write on the Vatican and its involvement 
in torture of children?

Will Dan Box write on the failure of the Victorian inquiry to provide 
real access to the law regardless of what age they are when they 
disclose their childhood sexual abuse?

Probably not in both instances.

Will Dan Box write to discredit Peter Fox yet again in another twisted 
piece of logic after his previous piece condemning Peter Fox for using 
his wife's email account - unsurprising I not long ago used my sons 
account - we both use Gmail, he had been using my computer; I went to 
Gmail clicked on Compose and wrote my message and off it went.

Lo and behold I should have written a submission to Dan explaining to 
him that his obsession in discrediting Peter Fox is becoming quite 
unprofessional considering that Dan grooms vulnerable victims at the 
Royal Commission promising them justice. It just seems implausible as 
when you realise Dan has been around the block a few times and has been 
presented with copious evidence that would implicate clergy and 
government officials etc etc and Dan somehow struggles to comprehend the 
relationship between that and the ongoing abuse of children.

Dan's first interests are not the interests of those he grooms, Dan has 
many interests that come before truth and justice for survivors of 
childhood abuse and heaven forbid sexual abuse by clergy; there is his 
job, the interest of his chief editor and the owner of the place where 
he works, they all get to come first in Dan's interest stakes.

Well done Dan, you missed it again. Just like the bishops and the pope 
Dan you just don't get it.

JohnB
0756412311